Слайд 2ETYMOLOGICAL ANALYSIS PART I
1) ORIGIN
NATIVE BORROWED:
a)origin language
c)source language
d) assimilation
![ETYMOLOGICAL ANALYSIS PART I 1) ORIGIN NATIVE BORROWED: a)origin language c)source language d) assimilation](/_ipx/f_webp&q_80&fit_contain&s_1440x1080/imagesDir/jpg/906569/slide-1.jpg)
Слайд 3ETYMOLOGICAL ANALYSIS PART II
2) TYPE OF SEMANTIC CHANGE
ORIGINAL MEANING vs MAJOR MEANING
![ETYMOLOGICAL ANALYSIS PART II 2) TYPE OF SEMANTIC CHANGE ORIGINAL MEANING vs MAJOR MEANING](/_ipx/f_webp&q_80&fit_contain&s_1440x1080/imagesDir/jpg/906569/slide-2.jpg)
Слайд 4SEMANTIC STRUCTURE ANALYSIS
1) MONOSEMANTIC vs POLYSEMANTIC
2) MAJOR MEANING VS MINOR MEANINGS
3) MINOR
![SEMANTIC STRUCTURE ANALYSIS 1) MONOSEMANTIC vs POLYSEMANTIC 2) MAJOR MEANING VS MINOR](/_ipx/f_webp&q_80&fit_contain&s_1440x1080/imagesDir/jpg/906569/slide-3.jpg)
MEANINGS:
ARE THEY A RESULT OF
METAPHORIC OR METONYMIC TRANSFER?
Слайд 5MORPHEMIC ANALYSIS
1) MONO- vs POLYMORPHEMIC
a)How many morphemes
b) prove that each
![MORPHEMIC ANALYSIS 1) MONO- vs POLYMORPHEMIC a)How many morphemes b) prove that](/_ipx/f_webp&q_80&fit_contain&s_1440x1080/imagesDir/jpg/906569/slide-4.jpg)
constituent is a morpheme
2) type of a morpheme according to:
2.1 structural classification
2.2 semantic classification
3) type of segmentability
4)Conclusion: 4.1 mono- vs polyradical
4.2 which type ?