Pros and Cons Assessment

Слайд 2

Advantages:
Easy and objective to mark
Learners see it as valid
Can test a wide

Advantages: Easy and objective to mark Learners see it as valid Can
range of language and skills
Disadvantages:
Quite dull
Does not assess productive ability
Random guessing can distort results

Слайд 3

2.gap-fill tests

2.gap-fill tests

Слайд 4

Advantages:
Quite objective to mark
Learners see it as valid
Can test productive ability indirectly
Can

Advantages: Quite objective to mark Learners see it as valid Can test
be adapted easily to make it harder or easier (e.g., by giving multiple-choice alternatives)
Can be used to target a range of language and lexis
Disadvantages:
Can require judgement if there are multiple possibilities
Does not directly assess productive ability
Random guessing can distort results

Слайд 5

3.re-ordering tasks: paragraphs, sentences, phrases, words

3.re-ordering tasks: paragraphs, sentences, phrases, words

Слайд 6

Advantages:
Adaptable: can be used with a range of text types
Learners see it

Advantages: Adaptable: can be used with a range of text types Learners
as valid
Can test receptive ability indirectly
Can be used to target syntax or discourse
Disadvantages:
Multiple correct ordering is sometimes possible so marking is more difficult
Time consuming to prepare and do
Does not target productive ability

Слайд 7

4. sentence transformation / skeleton sentences

4. sentence transformation / skeleton sentences

Слайд 8

Advantages:
Quite objective to mark
Learners see it as valid
Targets particular structures directly
Can be

Advantages: Quite objective to mark Learners see it as valid Targets particular
used to target a range of language and lexis
Disadvantages:
Can require judgement if there are multiple possibilities
Lack of lexical knowledge can interfere with the ability to do the grammar task

Слайд 9

5. information transfer (e.g., diagram to written text, diagram to spoken text)

5. information transfer (e.g., diagram to written text, diagram to spoken text)

Слайд 10

Advantages:
Directly assesses productive ability
Learners see it as valid
Can be adapted to make

Advantages: Directly assesses productive ability Learners see it as valid Can be
it harder or easier
Can be used to target a range of language and specific lexis (e.g., describing trends, making comparisons)
Disadvantages:
Time consuming to prepare
Advantages students who access graphical information easily
Subjective marking

Слайд 11

6.guided writing or speaking (structured response tests)

6.guided writing or speaking (structured response tests)

Слайд 12

Advantages:
Can be more objectively marked than free writing / speaking
Learners see it

Advantages: Can be more objectively marked than free writing / speaking Learners
as valid
Can test productive ability directly
Can be adapted to make it harder or easier
Can be used to target a range of communicative language functions and lexis
Disadvantages:
Can advantage students familiar with the topic
Cannot be purely objectively marked
Requires reading / listening comprehension to produce accurate responses in speaking or writing

Слайд 13

7.one-to-one or paired interviews (role plays etc.)

7.one-to-one or paired interviews (role plays etc.)
Имя файла: Pros-and-Cons-Assessment.pptx
Количество просмотров: 41
Количество скачиваний: 0