Содержание
- 2. PROJECT PLAN > Introduction. > Mikhail Speranskii’s Reforms. > Napoleon’s Invasion. > After the War. >
- 3. INTRODUCTION Although the reforming impulse at the Russian court did not die out after 1803, it
- 4. Mikhail Speranskii’s Reforms Concern about the inadequacies of the Russian political order continued. Alexander seemed to
- 5. MIKHAIL SPERANSKII
- 6. MORE ABOUT REFORMS State council, which was established in 1810 together with a reorganization of government
- 7. Napoleon’s Invasion Napoleon’s Grande Armée entered Russia in June 1812. Its forces numbered nearly half a
- 8. MAP
- 9. After the War The postNapoleonic settlement for the European world associated with the name of the
- 11. Скачать презентацию
Слайд 2PROJECT PLAN
> Introduction.
> Mikhail Speranskii’s Reforms.
> Napoleon’s Invasion.
> After the War.
> Questions.
PROJECT PLAN
> Introduction.
> Mikhail Speranskii’s Reforms.
> Napoleon’s Invasion.
> After the War.
> Questions.
Слайд 3INTRODUCTION
Although the reforming impulse at the Russian court did not die out
INTRODUCTION
Although the reforming impulse at the Russian court did not die out
after 1803, it had to give way for a time to the government’s concern with international affairs.
Peter the Great's conquests in the early 18th century had brought Russia into the European state system; the ensuing wars and alliances showed Russia to be an intimate partner in the balances and conflicts of the system.
The country could not stand apart from the upheaval now being caused in the European state system by Napoleonic France's wideranging conquests, rearrangements of national borders, and dominance of continental policy.
Peter the Great's conquests in the early 18th century had brought Russia into the European state system; the ensuing wars and alliances showed Russia to be an intimate partner in the balances and conflicts of the system.
The country could not stand apart from the upheaval now being caused in the European state system by Napoleonic France's wideranging conquests, rearrangements of national borders, and dominance of continental policy.
Слайд 4Mikhail Speranskii’s Reforms
Concern about the inadequacies of the Russian political order
Mikhail Speranskii’s Reforms
Concern about the inadequacies of the Russian political order
continued.
Alexander seemed to see the problem as essentially one of personnel, a shortage of honest & effective administrtor.
Others, however, recognized the need as well for structural changes.
One of these was Mikhail Mikhail Speranskii, a priest’s son, who rose from humble origins to the pinnacle of Russian government.
A brilliant seminary student and teacher, he became secretary to a highly placed aristocrat, served in the Ministry of Internal Affairs early in Alexander's reign, and by 1808 had risen to the position of State Secretary, the leading official for domestic affairs Mikhail.
Alexander seemed to see the problem as essentially one of personnel, a shortage of honest & effective administrtor.
Others, however, recognized the need as well for structural changes.
One of these was Mikhail Mikhail Speranskii, a priest’s son, who rose from humble origins to the pinnacle of Russian government.
A brilliant seminary student and teacher, he became secretary to a highly placed aristocrat, served in the Ministry of Internal Affairs early in Alexander's reign, and by 1808 had risen to the position of State Secretary, the leading official for domestic affairs Mikhail.
Слайд 5MIKHAIL SPERANSKII
MIKHAIL SPERANSKII
Слайд 6MORE ABOUT REFORMS
State council, which was established in 1810 together with a
MORE ABOUT REFORMS
State council, which was established in 1810 together with a
reorganization of government ministries.
By this time, the clouds of war were again gathering as Napoleon prepared the invasion of Russia.
Whether or not Alexander was inclined to additional government reforms, this was not the time to launch a political experiment that could have compromised lines of authority.
Moreover, Sperranskii was unpopular with the nobility because of his crackdown on incompetence and support of financial policies harmful to noble interests.
By this time, the clouds of war were again gathering as Napoleon prepared the invasion of Russia.
Whether or not Alexander was inclined to additional government reforms, this was not the time to launch a political experiment that could have compromised lines of authority.
Moreover, Sperranskii was unpopular with the nobility because of his crackdown on incompetence and support of financial policies harmful to noble interests.
Слайд 7Napoleon’s Invasion
Napoleon’s Grande Armée entered Russia in June 1812.
Its forces
Napoleon’s Invasion
Napoleon’s Grande Armée entered Russia in June 1812.
Its forces
numbered nearly half a million, almost twice the strength of the Russian army.
However, only half the invading army was French, the rest being composed of troops from countries conquered by Napoleon, which were less than reliable instruments for the pursuit of French aims.
The size of Napoleon’s army also presented grave problems of supply, especially after the Russian generals decided to withdraw deep into the country while stripping away supplies and housing in the path of Napoleon’s advance.
However, only half the invading army was French, the rest being composed of troops from countries conquered by Napoleon, which were less than reliable instruments for the pursuit of French aims.
The size of Napoleon’s army also presented grave problems of supply, especially after the Russian generals decided to withdraw deep into the country while stripping away supplies and housing in the path of Napoleon’s advance.
Слайд 8MAP
MAP
Слайд 9After the War
The postNapoleonic settlement for the European world associated with
After the War
The postNapoleonic settlement for the European world associated with
the name of the Congress of Vienna created a long period of general peace for the continent despite continuing stormy calls for democracy and national selfdetermination and the occasional limited conflicts they generated. The new state system, often mistakenly labelled a balance of power, was in reality a set of interlocking hegemonies exercised by Russia, Great Britain, and Austria.
As long as the governments of these countries were able to maintain amicable relations, no major conflicts arose in Europe or its dependencies. Towards the end of Alexander’s reign, the principles of the system–the legitimacy of established governments and territorial integrity of existing countries–were tested by the rebellion of Greeks within the Ottoman Empire.
Many Russians were sympathetic to the Greek cause.
As long as the governments of these countries were able to maintain amicable relations, no major conflicts arose in Europe or its dependencies. Towards the end of Alexander’s reign, the principles of the system–the legitimacy of established governments and territorial integrity of existing countries–were tested by the rebellion of Greeks within the Ottoman Empire.
Many Russians were sympathetic to the Greek cause.
- Предыдущая
Духовные искания Евгения ОнегинаСледующая -
Look at these photos