Testing in agile

Содержание

Слайд 2


Helen Vorobei
Quality Architect,
Testing Competency Center Expert
10 years in testing
E-mail: [email protected]

INTRODUCTION

Helen Vorobei Quality Architect, Testing Competency Center Expert 10 years in testing E-mail: Helen_Vorobei@epam.com INTRODUCTION

Слайд 3

AGENDA OF THE TRAINING

AGENDA OF THE TRAINING

Слайд 4

AGILE VALUES

AGILE VALUES

Слайд 5

AGILE VALUES

Individuals and interactions
Working software
Customer collaboration Responding to change

over processes and tools over

AGILE VALUES Individuals and interactions Working software Customer collaboration Responding to change
comprehensive documentation over contract negotiation over following a plan

Слайд 6

Individuals and Interactions Over Processes and Tools

AGILE VALUES AND REALITY

AGILE VALUE

WHAT IT

Individuals and Interactions Over Processes and Tools AGILE VALUES AND REALITY AGILE
MEANS

Small team, collocated, PO co located with the team
Cross functional, help each other
Team is empowered to make decisions

WHAT HAPPENS IN REAL WORLD

Team is distributed, time zone difference can be 10 hours
PO from customer side and hard to reach for the team
Team includes fill-time allocated developers and testers, but designers, dev-ops, automation in other teams

Слайд 7

Working product Over comprehensive requirements

AGILE VALUES AND REALITY

AGILE VALUE

WHAT IS MEANS

Ready (i.e.

Working product Over comprehensive requirements AGILE VALUES AND REALITY AGILE VALUE WHAT
Tested) product at the end of sprint

WHAT HAPPENS IN REAL WORLD

Developers write code till the last moment of the sprint
Testing can’t be completed in sprint
Some testing types are performed out of sprints (regression, integration, etc.)

Слайд 8

Customer collaboration Over contract negotiation

AGILE VALUES AND REALITY

AGILE VALUE

WHAT IS MEANS

Team defines

Customer collaboration Over contract negotiation AGILE VALUES AND REALITY AGILE VALUE WHAT
what it will commit to deliver at the end of the sprint
Requirements evolve, but timescales are fixed

WHAT HAPPENS IN REAL WORLD

Customer presses on the team the scope and timeline
And changes requirements within sprint
And provides not well defined requirements

Слайд 9

Responding to Change Over Following a Plan

AGILE VALUES AND REALITY

AGILE VALUE

WHAT IS

Responding to Change Over Following a Plan AGILE VALUES AND REALITY AGILE
MEANS

Sprint Retrospective – learn and improve, how to become more effective
Welcome changing requirements, even late in development

WHAT HAPPENS IN REAL WORLD

Team hesitates to say openly about problems
To much pressure to deliver to have time for retrospectives!
We have retrospectives, but nothing changes!
Requirement are being changed continuously because not ready before development starts

Слайд 11

HOW TESTER ROLE CHANGES IN AGILE

HOW TESTER ROLE CHANGES IN AGILE

Слайд 12

HOW TESTER ROLE CHANGES IN AGILE

Traditional approach

Agile approach

Testers detect the differences between

HOW TESTER ROLE CHANGES IN AGILE Traditional approach Agile approach Testers detect
existing and required conditions

Testers detect the differences between existing and required conditions

prevents

Слайд 13

WHERE TESTERS CAN REALLY INFLUENCE QUALITY?

Before sprint:
Grooming
3 Amigo sessions
Planning

In sprint:
Test as soon

WHERE TESTERS CAN REALLY INFLUENCE QUALITY? Before sprint: Grooming 3 Amigo sessions
as feature ready
Collaborate with developers
Move all testing types in sprint
Define Testing Pyramid
Control Definition of Done

At the end of the sprint:
Retrospective

Слайд 14

BEFORE SPRINT ACTIVITIES

BEFORE SPRINT ACTIVITIES

Слайд 15

CLARIFYING REQUIREMENTS – OPTION 1: GROOMING/ SPRINT REFINEMENT/SCRUM GUIDE

When
Input
Who participates
What testers do

CLARIFYING REQUIREMENTS – OPTION 1: GROOMING/ SPRINT REFINEMENT/SCRUM GUIDE When Input Who

before grooming
On grooming

Before a sprint, even 1 week before
User Stories created and described by PO
All team, dev and test, PO
Analyze user stories from the point of:
What information is missing and will prevent us from testing?
What is strange /not logical/contradicts other requirements?
Do I know how to test this?
What is missing to test this? ( e.g. data )
Ask questions by user stories
Clarify PO answers
Plan if needed additional discussions (e.g. with architecture)

Слайд 16

CLARIFYING REQUIREMENTS OPTION 2 - 3 AMIGOS SESSIONS

Define 3 Amigos from each

CLARIFYING REQUIREMENTS OPTION 2 - 3 AMIGOS SESSIONS Define 3 Amigos from
team to discuss user stories:
Business Analysis or Product Owner -What problem are we trying to solve?
Developer -How might we build a solution to solve that problem?
Tester -What about this, what could possibly happen?

When it works better:
Pre-grooming sessions
Discuss high-level requirements
When team capacity is very limited and can’t invite the whole team

Слайд 17

WHAT CAN GO WRONG?

WHAT CAN HAPPEN?

Not enough stories exist/have details in the

WHAT CAN GO WRONG? WHAT CAN HAPPEN? Not enough stories exist/have details
backlog before grooming
PO does not know what the purpose of the story or details
PO is not ready to answer to questions
PO does not come on grooming

Team works with several POs and they contradict each other
PO changes opinion a bit later
Requirements are changed on the fly

WHAT CAN WE DO?

Plan grooming in advance
Prepare and share questions with PO before session
Push to “move out of sprint” not clear stories on planning

Store PO’s answers in common source
Have answers recorded
Measure and communicated impact of changes

Слайд 18

PLANNING

When
Input
Who participates
What testers do
Output

The 1-th day of a sprint
User stories with clarified

PLANNING When Input Who participates What testers do Output The 1-th day
requirements (after grooming)
All team, dev and test, PO
Estimate testing for each story
Discuss if testing seems not proportional to development/ too complex
Propose technical debt stories
Create tasks
Sprint backlog: estimated stories that team commits to deliver at the end of sprint

Слайд 19

ESTIMATES: WHAT IF

WHAT CAN HAPPEN?

Team cannot estimate the user story

Team members have

ESTIMATES: WHAT IF WHAT CAN HAPPEN? Team cannot estimate the user story
great differences between estimates

Customer presses for lower estimates

WHAT CAN WE DO?

Check that user story satisfies INVEST criteria
Clarify requirements again
Break story on smaller pieces
Consult with architect or any other experts

Discuss what are included in estimates by team members
Ask to explain estimates

Provide detailed estimates
Explain the risks of estimates reduction – there won’t be any stories for delivery at the end of sprint, because team can not complete all tasks, quality risks – will be a lot of defects

Слайд 20

IN SPRINT ACTIVITIES

Tester goal: provide immediate feedback to developers!

IN SPRINT ACTIVITIES Tester goal: provide immediate feedback to developers!

Слайд 21

HOW CAN WE FIND DEFECTS EARLIER OR PREVENT THEM?

Get clear requirements after

HOW CAN WE FIND DEFECTS EARLIER OR PREVENT THEM? Get clear requirements
grooming/ 3 amigos sessions
Collaborate with developers:
Explain what you are going to test, show your checklists/ test cases
Clarify together any questions regarding to user stories
Propose “good” development practices to use: unit tests, code review, coding standards, etc.
Agreed about continuous deployment to test feature as soon as it is ready, not waste time for waiting new builds
Don’t postpone “special” testing type till the end of release

Слайд 22

Development

Planning

Tests design & Test execution

Review
Demo
Retrospective

Sprint

Sprint

1st

IDEAL TESTING TIMELINE IN SPRINT

Development Planning Tests design & Test execution Review Demo Retrospective Sprint Sprint

Слайд 23

TO BUILD IDEAL TESTING TIMELINE WE NEED

Define Testing Pyramid
Integrate auto tests into

TO BUILD IDEAL TESTING TIMELINE WE NEED Define Testing Pyramid Integrate auto
CI/CD pipeline
Execute frequently:
Unit tests - after each commit,
Smoke tests – after build deployment,
Regression tests – nightly (on demand or by schedule)

Слайд 24

TESTING PYRAMID

time

cost

TESTING PYRAMID time cost

Слайд 25

HOW MANY PROJECTS HAVE A “TESTING PHASE” AFTER SPRINTS?

Regression testing
Integration testing
Compatibility testing
Mobile

HOW MANY PROJECTS HAVE A “TESTING PHASE” AFTER SPRINTS? Regression testing Integration
testing
Performance testing

HOW MOVE THEM IN SPRINT

Build Testing Pyramid, include auto tests in CI/CD
Test integration with mocks
Agree with separate teams about time readiness of 3-d party component
Create compatibility matrix
Divide tests with mobile/browser specific or not
Distribute functional and regression tests between browsers and devices

WHAT TESTING TYPES ARE OFTEN OUT OF SPRINT?

Слайд 26

WHAT CAN HAPPEN DURING SPRINT?

WHAT CAN HAPPEN?

Test environment is down

No test data

Dependences

WHAT CAN HAPPEN DURING SPRINT? WHAT CAN HAPPEN? Test environment is down
from other teams/systems

WHAT CAN WE DO?

If it often happens, set up back-up test environment
If it is caused issues with build deployment => CI/CD, automation tests, unit tests
Discuss with dev lead/ DM/Customer. Total time we lose is the strongest argument

How can we get as production-like data as possible? ) (replication, sub setting , anonymization, generation)

Develop mocks and stubs
Agree with other teams about delivery dates

Слайд 27

WHAT CAN HAPPEN DURING SPRINT?

WHAT CAN HAPPEN?

Developers deliver scope till the end

WHAT CAN HAPPEN DURING SPRINT? WHAT CAN HAPPEN? Developers deliver scope till
of the very last day

A lot of defects in the functionality

WHAT CAN WE DO?

Agree day when the first developed stories will be delivered for testing
Push developers to deliver changes smoothly
Agree X days or hours before end of sprint when all stories will be delivered
Reduce team's capacity by the number of points not achieved

Unit tests, automation tests in CI/CD pipeline run before build deployment
Test locally
Define bug root cause: environment issues, requirements issues, code issues (unit tests are passed?)

Слайд 28

DEFINITION OF DONE

DEFINITION OF DONE

Слайд 29

Code completed and checked in
Code review done
Unit tests created and passed
Tests created

Code completed and checked in Code review done Unit tests created and
and passed on all envs
Bugs fixed and verified

DEFINITION OF DONE FOR USER STORY

Слайд 30

All stories done
Regression testing done
Integration testing done
Performance testing done
Build documentation prepared
Etc.

DEFINITION

All stories done Regression testing done Integration testing done Performance testing done
OF DONE FOR SPRINT

Слайд 31

AFTER SPRINT ACTIVITIES

AFTER SPRINT ACTIVITIES

Слайд 32

RETROSPECTIVE MEETING: WHAT AND WHY

Retrospective is the meeting where the team discusses

RETROSPECTIVE MEETING: WHAT AND WHY Retrospective is the meeting where the team
what could be changed that might make the next sprint more value

Why retrospective is important?
Help to identify team’s problems if there are or areas for improvements
Better way to solve issues or do improvements
Motivate the team: team feels power to change process as they want
Allow to say thank you to team members and share best practices within the team
Team building

Слайд 33

RETROSPECTIVE BOARD

Write on stickers
what was well
what need to drop
what to improve
Put

RETROSPECTIVE BOARD Write on stickers what was well what need to drop
on the board
Clarify all items
Vote for items that should be improved first

Слайд 34

HOW DO RETROSPECTIVE EFFECTIVELY?

• Do not play the blame game
Talk about facts,

HOW DO RETROSPECTIVE EFFECTIVELY? • Do not play the blame game Talk
not about people
• Focus not on problems, focus on solution
• Be prepared
Analyze sprint activities in advance (All was delivered in time? All was done in time? Everything was done?)
Not only raise the problems, propose solutions
• Use facts and numbers
For example, delivery was delays on ..days

Слайд 35

WHAT IMPORTANT TO CONSIDER?

Were new features delivered regularly, not in the end?
Where

WHAT IMPORTANT TO CONSIDER? Were new features delivered regularly, not in the
there blocker/critical issues?
Did the team have downtime during sprint?
Burndown: planned and real lines – are they near each other?
Team velocity: did team do all tasks that planned? Can team do more? How velocity compares to the previous sprint?
Was all testing done in sprint?
All scrum ceremonies were done: grooming, planning, daily stand ups, review and demo?
What was making our work hard?

Слайд 36

RETROSPECTIVE: WHAT IF?

WHAT CAN HAPPEN?

Team hesitate to say openly about the problems

Too

RETROSPECTIVE: WHAT IF? WHAT CAN HAPPEN? Team hesitate to say openly about
much pressure to deliver, no time for retrospectives!

We have retrospectives, but nothing changes

WHAT CAN WE DO?

Remind the team about the goal of retro: find solution, not guilty
Organize retro in the way when everyone has a chance to say/write his/her opinion

First items for discussion on meeting!
Think about action items together

During retro team is voting for actions that should be done next sprint and include them into story board
For each action – owner and timeline ( even small step in the right direction)
Start retro with reviewing actions that should be done from previous retro

Слайд 37

SUMMARY: YOU INFLUENCE QUALITY

SUMMARY: YOU INFLUENCE QUALITY

Слайд 38

SUMMARY: YOU INFLUENCE QUALITY

SUMMARY: YOU INFLUENCE QUALITY
Имя файла: Testing-in-agile.pptx
Количество просмотров: 47
Количество скачиваний: 0