English Language Development. Trends. Prospects. Challenges. The problem of standard. Standardization milestones

Слайд 2

Standardization milestones

1500, Westminster English dominating dialect. The dominance of Latin was not

Standardization milestones 1500, Westminster English dominating dialect. The dominance of Latin was
questioned English was inferior.
1712, foundation of an English Academy (with the task of ‘Correcting, Improving, and Ascertaining the English Tongue’ )
1755, publication of Dr Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary of the English Language.
in 1795 Lindley Murray. Wrote and published the first edition of The English Grammar Adapted to the Different Classes of Learners.
By 1800, the rules of English grammar had been established.

Слайд 3

Great English Grammar Settlement is under threat:
New social attitudes (permissive approach to

Great English Grammar Settlement is under threat: New social attitudes (permissive approach
standard and language learning )
The internet, (merging of spoken and written language )
Globalisation (gazillion of alternations in numerous territorial substandards)

Слайд 4

Global exposure to the English language
First Language
English as a Second Language

Global exposure to the English language First Language English as a Second
or ELF
English as a Foreign Language

Слайд 5

linguist’s view vs. populist’s view

(1) the concept of a closed and

linguist’s view vs. populist’s view (1) the concept of a closed and
finite rule system is inadequate for the description of natural languages;
(2) as a consequence, the writing of variable rules to modify such rule systems so as to accommodate the properties of natural language is inappropriate;
(3) the concept of such rule systems belongs instead to a world of stereotypes about language, which are usually politically or ideologically motivated and which must be constantly re-examined, or to written language, which is different in nature and not an alternative representation of spoken language.’

Слайд 6

Changes suspected to be going on in present-day standard English

a tendency to

Changes suspected to be going on in present-day standard English a tendency
regularise irregular morphology (e.g. dreamt Æ dreamed)
b. revival of the "mandative" subjunctive, probably inspired by formal US usage (we demand that she take part in the meeting)
c. elimination of shall as a future marker in the first person
d. development of new, auxiliary-like uses of certain lexical verbs (e.g. get, want – cf., e.g., The way you look, you wanna / want to see a doctor soon) 6
e. extension of the progressive to new constructions, e.g. modal, present perfect and past perfect passive progressive (the road would not be being built/ has not been being built/ had not been being built before the general elections)

Слайд 7

f. increase in the number and types of multi-word verbs (phrasal verbs,

f. increase in the number and types of multi-word verbs (phrasal verbs,
have/take/give a ride, etc.)
g. placement of frequency adverbs before auxiliary verbs (even if no emphasis is intended – I never have said so)
h. do-support for have (have you any money? and no, I haven't any money Æ do you have/ have you got any money? and no, I don't have any money/ haven't got any money)
i. demise of the inflected form whom j. increasing use of less instead of fewer with countable nouns (e.g. less people)

Слайд 8

k. spread of the s-genitive to non-human nouns (the book's cover)
l.

k. spread of the s-genitive to non-human nouns (the book's cover) l.
omission of the definite article in certain environments (e.g. renowned Nobel laureate Derek Walcott)
m. "singular" they (everybody came in their car)
n. like, same as, and immediately used as conjunctions
o. a tendency towards analytical comparatives and superlatives (politer Æ more polite)

Слайд 9

Syntactic changes

Syntactic changes are seen as embedded in a context where

Syntactic changes Syntactic changes are seen as embedded in a context where
semantic, pragmatic and sociolinguistic factors perform function of determinants of change.
Study of ongoing grammatical change in present-day English, presumably should be corpus-based
point of departure: mid-20th century standard American and British written English, documented in 2 matching reference corpora, namely the Brown and LOB corpora

Слайд 10

Corpus-based approaches are combined with other methods in detailed studies of lexicogrammatical

Corpus-based approaches are combined with other methods in detailed studies of lexicogrammatical
phenomena
recent emergence of the topic-introducing preposition as far as (e.g. "as far as my situation, I am less than optimistic …")
emergence of prepositional uses of following.
emergence of (be) like as a quotation-introducing form in some spoken registers of American English (and increasingly in British English)

Слайд 11

Major current trends in the tense, modality, aspect and voice systems of

Major current trends in the tense, modality, aspect and voice systems of
English

An increase in the frequency of occurrence of progressives in general,
The establishment of the progressive in a few remaining niches of the verbal paradigm in which it was not current until the 20th century.
Dramatic increase in the frequency of the progressive from late Middle English onwards has been confirmed
emergence of the progressive passive (dinner was being prepared) approximately 200 years ago

Слайд 12

Progressive forms in the press sections of the four reference corpora

Progressive forms in the press sections of the four reference corpora

Слайд 13

There might be some grammatical symptoms of a more general stylistic change,

There might be some grammatical symptoms of a more general stylistic change,
in which the norms of written English have moved closer to spoken usage, where the progressive has presumably always been more common than in writing

Слайд 14

TEXTING SAMPLE

A: HRU
B: AAK
A: D4D
B: TTLY

TEXTING SAMPLE A: HRU B: AAK A: D4D B: TTLY

Слайд 15

TEXTING SAMPLE

A: How are you?
B: Alive and kicking.
A: Down for date?
B: Totally.

TEXTING SAMPLE A: How are you? B: Alive and kicking. A: Down for date? B: Totally.