Слайд 2GUIDING QUESTION OF THE COURSE
How free are individuals in the construction
of their lifestyles under the pressure of social structure?
Слайд 3 STRUCTURALISM (objectivism, positivism, externalism)
Pierre Bourdieu:
“… Practices are seen as no more
than the acting-out of roles, the playing of scores or the implementation of plans”.
Слайд 4SUBJECTIVISM (internalism)
Subjectivist tradition in the study of social structure:
People define themselves their
position in class, ethnic structures, social stratificatin and in the society in general.
Subjectivist theories take reasons and values to be definable in terms of some relation to desires and/or emotions.
Слайд 5Subjectivism
It stresses the special role of subjectivity in the constructing of social
world and ignores social structures.
Berkeley expressed this in his classic statement that the world is as I see it.
“Subjectivity includes processes denoted by the terms mental, mind, conscious, experience, agency, will, intentionality, thinking, feeling, remembering, interpreting, understanding, learning, and psyche. These subjective processes comprise the activity of subjects”.
“Subjectivism construes subjectivity as the product of the subject or individual…” (Carl Ratner).
Слайд 6SOCIAL SPACE
Social space is a multi-dimensional space of positions.
Many positions can be
defined in terms of a multi-dimensional system of co-ordinates.
Слайд 7Pierre Bourdieu
“The social field can be described as a multi-dimensional space of
positions such that each actual position can be defined in terms of a multi-dimensional system of co-ordinates whose values correspond to the values of the different pertinent [applicable] variables. Agents are thus distributed, in the first dimension, according to the overall volume of capital they dispossess and, in the second dimension, according to the composition of their capital – in other words, according to the relative weight of the different kinds of capital in the total set of their assets”.
Слайд 9Multi-dimensional character of the social space
Space of politics.
Space of economy.
Space of education.
Space of journalism.
Space of sport.
Etc.
Слайд 10Social group
A number of individual positions, defined by formal or informal
criteria of membership. They are bound together in relatively stable patterns of interaction.
Слайд 11STATISTICAL AND REAL GROUPS
Statistical groups (or groups on the paper) are products
of researcher’s classification.
Real social group is a set of individual positions which are bound together in relatively stable patterns of interaction.
Real social groups are social fields.
Слайд 12Social relations
are relations between social groups, positions, roles.
Слайд 13SOCIAL FIELD
It is a field of forces, a set of objective
power relations imposed on all those who enter this field, relations which are not reducible to the intentions of individual agents or even to direct interactions between agents.
(P.Bourdieu)
Слайд 14STATUS POSITION
It is a position in the social space
(teacher, doctor, president,
wife, woman, etc.)
Слайд 15Structure of social status
Duties.
Rights.
Social expectations.
Слайд 17Ascribed Status
It refers to those social positions to which a person
is allocated either by birth or by family background and which cannot be altered according to individual accomplishments.
Слайд 18Ascribed Status
The status ascribed on the basis of
race,
ethnicity,
gender.
Слайд 19Achieved Status
Any social position held by an individual as a result
of his or her personal accomplishments in open formal or market competition with other.
Слайд 20The distinction between achievement and ascription
An individual’s social class standing might
be an achieved status through occupational attainment or ascribed through family background. Some apparently achievement-based outcomes (including examination performance and occupational attainment), can at least in part reflect ascriptive mechanisms – such as gender, discrimination or race prejudice.
Слайд 21Social institutions
Сhanging patterns of behavior based on relatively more stable value systems.
They
constrain and determine the behavior of specific social groups.
Слайд 22Social Institutions
Church.
Ownership.
Family.
Law.
Marriage.
What is common?
Слайд 23TYPES OF SOCIETIES
Etacratic societies.
(a) ‘Asian modes of production’ (Marx).
(b)
State socialism.
Western civilization.
(a) Antic societies.
(b) Medieval European societies.
(c ) Modern market societies.
Слайд 24SOCIAL SPACE & DOMINANT SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS
STATE
PRIVATE
PROPERTY
Слайд 25SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION IN MODERN WORLD
Слайд 26SOCIAL STRUCTURE
Available resources.
Rules of distribution.
Practices defined by resources
and rules.
Слайд 27SOCIAL HIERARCHY OF THE SOCIAL SPACE
Inequality in distribution of social resources
among parts (fields) of the space.
Слайд 28Social Field’s Structure
1. Resources.
2. Cultural program (rules, norms, values).
3. Communicative
system (language).
Слайд 29Social structure: individual perspective
It is a structure of life-chances (opportunities and
limitations).
Key question:
How can people live?
Слайд 30MAIN TYPES OF STRUCTURES
Class structure (distribution of economic power).
Social stratification
(in narrow sense): upper – middle – low strata (rich – middle – poor).
Gender structure.
Age structure.
Citizenship.
Ethnic structure.
Слайд 31AGENCY (ACTION)
This category emphasizes implicitly the undetermined nature of human action,
as opposed to the alleged determination of structural theories*.
Слайд 32SPACE OF DESIRES
Key question:
How do people want to live?
Group of secondary
questions:
What kind of factors defines desires?
Слайд 33SYNTESIS of AGENCY AND STRUCTURE
Слайд 34PRACTICES
Trajectories structured by spaces of opportunities and desires.
Слайд 35DUALITY OF STRUCTURE
A. Giddens;
“… The structural properties of social system are both
medium and outcome of the practice they recursively [repeated] organize. Structure is not ‘external’ to individuals: as memory traces, and as instantiated in social practices, it is in a certain sense more ‘internal’ than exterior to their activities…
Слайд 36DUALITY OF STRUCTURE
A. Giddens:
“ Structure is not to be equated with constraint
but is always both constraining and enabling”.
Слайд 37MODE OF LIFE
Ways of life directly shaped by the social structure.
Слайд 38HABITUS
It is the result of the objectification of social structure at the
level of individual subjectivity.
It is a bridge between social structure and structure of mind.
Слайд 39STRUCTURE OF HABITUS
A set of acquired patterns of thought, behavior, and
taste.
Free habits.
It is a link between social structures and social action.
Слайд 40LIFESTYLES
Alternative ways of life within the space of opportunities.
Freely selected modes
of behavior.
Style of consumption is a core of the lifestyle.
Слайд 41INDIVIDUALISATION OF SOCIAL STRUCTURES
Individual as a unique actor construct its lifestyle
within social limits and opportunities of available social space.
Social patterns of life are shaped by individual peculiarities. Social status appears in individual forms.
Слайд 42CLASS STRUCTURE
Space of economic life-chances on the labor market (opportunities & limitations).
Class practices are free styles of behavior within limits of class space.
Class practices are defines by class habitus.
Слайд 43SOCIAL STRATIFICATION
(in narrow sense)
Space of opportunities limited by available consuming
resources (income, wealth).
Practices within this space are resulted from free choice of available alternatives.
Free choice is shaped by habitus.
Слайд 44GENDER STRUCTURE
Space of opportunities and limitations shaped by gender norms and
values.
Practices within this space resulted from the free choice of available styles of being male or female.
Free choice is shaped by gender habitus.