_c525548ba48c691039adc1e8ba645075_MOD-2_PART-II

Слайд 2

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)

Part II.
Evidence-Based Assessment

Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) Part II. Evidence-Based Assessment

Слайд 3

Evidence-based Assessment of ADHD Symptoms

There are a number of well-developed, validated, and

Evidence-based Assessment of ADHD Symptoms There are a number of well-developed, validated,
useful measures for identifying the presence of ADHD symptoms.
Many of these are in the form of parent and teacher rating scales.
(Pelham, Fabiano, & Massetti, 2005)

Слайд 4

Sampling of ADHD Rating Scales

Swanson, Nolan & Pelham (SNAP) Rating Scale
(Atkins,

Sampling of ADHD Rating Scales Swanson, Nolan & Pelham (SNAP) Rating Scale
et al., 1985, Atkins et al., 1988; Gaub & Carlson, 1997; MTA Cooperative Group, 1999; Pelham & Bender, 1982)
ADHD Rating Scale
(DuPaul et al., 1991,1997; DuPaul, Anastopoulos et al., 1998; Gomez et al., 1999;Power et al., 1998)
Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale
(Pelham, et al., 1992; Pelham, Evans et al., 1992)
Vanderbilt Rating Scale
(Wolraich, et al., 1998, 2003)
ADHD Symptom Checklist-4
(Gadow & Nolan, 2002; Gadow & Sprafkin, 1997; Gadow et al., 2001; Mattison et al., 2003; Sprafkin et al., 2001, 2002)

Слайд 5

Sampling of Other Rating Scales

Child Behavior Checklist/Teacher Report Form
(Achenbach & Rescorla,

Sampling of Other Rating Scales Child Behavior Checklist/Teacher Report Form (Achenbach &
2001; Anastopoulos, et al., 1993; Barkley et al., 2000; Ostrander, et al., 1998)
Behavioral Assessment Scale for Children
(Ostrander et al., 1998; Reynolds & Kamphaus, 2002)
Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales
(Conners et al., 1998 a,b; Goyette et al., 1978; Roberts et al., 1981)
IOWA Conners Rating Scale
(Atkins et al., 1989; Loney & Milich, 1982; Milich et al., 1982; Pelham et al., 1989)

Слайд 6

Common Factors Across Rating Scales

Parent and Teacher Versions
Based on DSM classification system
Use

Common Factors Across Rating Scales Parent and Teacher Versions Based on DSM
a Likert Scale for ratings
All have evidence of reliability and validity; psychometric soundness.
Effective at discriminating between clinical and non-clinical groups.
Sensitive to behavioral and pharmacological treatment effects.

Слайд 7

Limitations of Rating Scales

Provide idea of frequency and/or severity of symptoms, but

Limitations of Rating Scales Provide idea of frequency and/or severity of symptoms,
no information on context.
“Often does not seem to listen when spoken to directly.”
Typically do not provide information on degree of impairment due to symptoms.

Слайд 8

Diagnostic Interviews

Structured Interviews
Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents – Revised
Diagnostic Interview

Diagnostic Interviews Structured Interviews Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents – Revised
Schedule for Children
Semi-Structured Interviews
Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia
Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment

Слайд 9

Limitations of Diagnostic Interviews

Limitations are similar to those of rating scales.
Also very

Limitations of Diagnostic Interviews Limitations are similar to those of rating scales.
costly in terms of patient and clinician time.
Limited incremental validity.
Имя файла: _c525548ba48c691039adc1e8ba645075_MOD-2_PART-II.pptx
Количество просмотров: 38
Количество скачиваний: 0