Morphological Structure of English Words

Содержание

Слайд 2

The word as an autonomous unit of the language system should be

The word as an autonomous unit of the language system should be
distinguished from another fundamental language unit – the morpheme.

Слайд 3

A morpheme

Is an association of a given meaning with a given

A morpheme Is an association of a given meaning with a given
sound pattern, which makes it similar to a word.
Unlike a word, a morpheme is not autonomous, morphemes occur in speech only as constituent parts of words.
Cannot be divided into smaller meaningful units, so it is defined as the minimum meaningful unit of the language system.

Слайд 4

According to their form

Morphemes

Free

Bound

Semi-bound
(semi-free)

According to their form Morphemes Free Bound Semi-bound (semi-free)

Слайд 5

Free morphemes

Are capable of forming words without adding other morphemes, which means

Free morphemes Are capable of forming words without adding other morphemes, which
that they coincide with the stems or independent forms of words:
House- (morpheme) = house (word)
Shoe- (morpheme) = shoe (word)
Bread- (morpheme) = bread (word)

Слайд 6

Bound morphemes

May not stand alone without a loss or change of their

Bound morphemes May not stand alone without a loss or change of
meaning, they are always bound to something else. It means that they do not coincide with stems or independent forms of words:
Horr- (morpheme) – horr-or (word)
Agit- (morpheme) – agit-ate (word)
Nat- (morpheme) – nat-ion (word)
-Ible (morpheme) – elig-ible (word)
Pre- (morpheme) – pre-war (word)

Слайд 7

Free and Bound morphemes

Prefixes and suffixes (jointly called derivational affixes) are always

Free and Bound morphemes Prefixes and suffixes (jointly called derivational affixes) are
bound
Root morphemes may be both free and bound
Bound root morphemes are mainly found among loan words: arrog-ance, char-ity, cour-age, dis-tort, in-volve, toler-able, etc.

Слайд 8

Semi-bound (semi-free) morphemes

Can function in a morphemic sequence both as an affix

Semi-bound (semi-free) morphemes Can function in a morphemic sequence both as an
and as a free morpheme:
E.g., the morphemes «well» and «half» can occur as free morphemes (cf. sleep well, half an hour) or as bound morphemes (cf. well-known, half-done)

Слайд 9

According to their role in constructing words

Morphemes

Roots

Affixes

According to their role in constructing words Morphemes Roots Affixes

Слайд 10

According to their position in a word

Affixes

Prefixes

Suffixes

Infixes
(unproductive
in English)

According to their position in a word Affixes Prefixes Suffixes Infixes (unproductive in English)

Слайд 11

According to their function and meaning

Affixes

Derivational

Functional
(Endings,
inflexions)

According to their function and meaning Affixes Derivational Functional (Endings, inflexions)

Слайд 12

A stem

When a derivational or functional affix is stripped from the word,

A stem When a derivational or functional affix is stripped from the
what remains is a stem (a stem base)
If a stem consists of a single morpheme, it is simple (heart, fact, month, red, etc.)
If a stem consists of a root and an affix, it is derived (hearty, factual, monthly, reddish, etc.)
If a stem consists of two root morphemes (and an affix / affixes), it is compound (teaspoon, mother-in-law, dog-owner, looking-glass, etc.)

Слайд 13

A root

Is the main morphemic vehicle of a given idea in a

A root Is the main morphemic vehicle of a given idea in
given language at a given stage of its development
Is the ultimate constituent element which remains after the removal of all functional and derivational affixes and does not admit any further analysis
Is the common element of words within a word-cluster (cf. heart, hearten, dishearten, heartily, heartless, hearty, heartiness, sweetheart, heart-broken, etc.)

Слайд 14

A root

The etymological treatment of root morphemes encourages a search for cognates

A root The etymological treatment of root morphemes encourages a search for
(elements descended from a common ancestor):
Heart (English) – cor (Latin) – kardia (Greek) – corazon (Spanish) – Herz (German) – сердце (Russian), etc.

Слайд 15

A suffix

Is a derivational morpheme following the stem and forming a new

A suffix Is a derivational morpheme following the stem and forming a
derivative in a different part of speech or a different word class: luck – luck-y – luck-i-ly

Слайд 16

A prefix

Is a derivational morpheme standing before the root and modifying the

A prefix Is a derivational morpheme standing before the root and modifying
meaning of the original word: happy – unhappy, president – ex-president, argument – counter-argument, etc.

Слайд 17

A prefix

Prefixes do not generally change the part-of-speech meaning of the resultant

A prefix Prefixes do not generally change the part-of-speech meaning of the
word
An exception to the rule is the formation of some verbs and statives: friend, n – befriend, v; earth, n – unearth (выкапывать, вырывать из земли, доставать из-под земли), v; sleep, n – asleep (stative), etc.

Слайд 18

An infix

Is an affix placed within the word: -n- in «stand» (this

An infix Is an affix placed within the word: -n- in «stand»
type is not productive).

Слайд 19

Combining forms

Affixes should not be confused with combining forms
A combining form

Combining forms Affixes should not be confused with combining forms A combining
is a bound form that is distinguished from an affix historically by the fact that it is always borrowed from another language in which it existed as a free or combining form.

Слайд 20

Combining forms

Most combining forms were borrowed from Latin and Greek (however, not

Combining forms Most combining forms were borrowed from Latin and Greek (however,
exclusively) and have thus become international:
Cyclo- (from Greek «kuklos» - circle): cyclometer, cyclopedia, cyclic, bicycle, etc.
Mal- (from French «mal» - bad): malfunction, malnutrition, etc.
Compound and derivative words which these combining forms are part of never existed in their original language but were coined only in modern times.

Слайд 21


Morphemic and Structural Analysis of English Words

Morphemic and Structural Analysis of English Words

Слайд 22

Morphemic analysis

Implies stating the number and type of morphemes that make up

Morphemic analysis Implies stating the number and type of morphemes that make
the word:
Girl (one root morpheme) – a root word
Girlish (one root morpheme plus one affix) – a derived word
Girl-friend (two stems) – a compound word
Last-minuter (two stems and a common affix) – a compound derivative

Слайд 23

Structural word-formation analysis
Studies the structural correlation with other words as well as

Structural word-formation analysis Studies the structural correlation with other words as well
the structural patterns or rules on which words are built

Слайд 24

Structural word-formation analysis

A correlation is a set of binary oppositions, in which

Structural word-formation analysis A correlation is a set of binary oppositions, in
each second element is derived from the first by a general rule valid for all members of the relation:
Child – childish
Woman – womanish
Monkey – monkeyish
Spinster – spinsterish, etc.

Слайд 25

Structural word-formation analysis

This correlation demonstrates that
in English there is a type

Structural word-formation analysis This correlation demonstrates that in English there is a
of derived adjectives consisting of a noun stem and a suffix –ish;
the stems are mostly those of animate nouns;
any one word built according to this pattern contains a semantic component common to the whole group, namely «typical of, or having the bad qualities of».

Слайд 26

Morphological Analysis of English Words

Morphological Analysis of English Words

Слайд 27

A synchronic morphological analysis (introduced by L. Bloomfield)

Is accomplished by the procedure

A synchronic morphological analysis (introduced by L. Bloomfield) Is accomplished by the
known as the analysis into immediate constituents
The main opposition here is the opposition of stem and affix which reveals the motivation of the word

Слайд 28

A synchronic morphological analysis

Ungentlemanly

Un-

gentlemanly

gentleman

ly

gentle

man

gent

le

A synchronic morphological analysis Ungentlemanly Un- gentlemanly gentleman ly gentle man gent le

Слайд 29

A synchronic morphological analysis

Un- is split after the pattern: un- + adjective

A synchronic morphological analysis Un- is split after the pattern: un- +
stem (uncertain, unconscious, uneasy, unearthly, untimely, unwomanly, etc.);
-Ly is split following the pattern: noun stem + -ly (womanly, masterly, scholarly, etc.);
Gentleman is split into gentle- + -man after a similar pattern observed in «nobleman» (adjective stem + the semi-affix -man)
Gentle is split into gent- + -le following the pattern: noun stem + -le (brittle, fertile, juvenile, noble, subtle, little, etc.)

Слайд 30

A synchronic morphological analysis
The constituents that allow further splitting into morphemes are

A synchronic morphological analysis The constituents that allow further splitting into morphemes
called immediate (gentlemanly, gentleman, gentle),
Those that don’t allow this are termed ultimate (un-, -ly, gent-, le-, -man).

Слайд 31

A synchronic morphological analysis

The procedure of the analysis into immediate constituents is

A synchronic morphological analysis The procedure of the analysis into immediate constituents
reduced to the recognition and classification of the same and different morphemes as well as same and different patterns: thus it permits the tracing and understanding of the vocabulary system.
Имя файла: Morphological-Structure-of-English-Words.pptx
Количество просмотров: 338
Количество скачиваний: 4