Слайд 2
The word as an autonomous unit of the language system should be
distinguished from another fundamental language unit – the morpheme.
Слайд 3A morpheme
Is an association of a given meaning with a given
sound pattern, which makes it similar to a word.
Unlike a word, a morpheme is not autonomous, morphemes occur in speech only as constituent parts of words.
Cannot be divided into smaller meaningful units, so it is defined as the minimum meaningful unit of the language system.
Слайд 4According to their form
Morphemes
Free
Bound
Semi-bound
(semi-free)
Слайд 5Free morphemes
Are capable of forming words without adding other morphemes, which means
that they coincide with the stems or independent forms of words:
House- (morpheme) = house (word)
Shoe- (morpheme) = shoe (word)
Bread- (morpheme) = bread (word)
Слайд 6Bound morphemes
May not stand alone without a loss or change of their
meaning, they are always bound to something else. It means that they do not coincide with stems or independent forms of words:
Horr- (morpheme) – horr-or (word)
Agit- (morpheme) – agit-ate (word)
Nat- (morpheme) – nat-ion (word)
-Ible (morpheme) – elig-ible (word)
Pre- (morpheme) – pre-war (word)
Слайд 7Free and Bound morphemes
Prefixes and suffixes (jointly called derivational affixes) are always
bound
Root morphemes may be both free and bound
Bound root morphemes are mainly found among loan words: arrog-ance, char-ity, cour-age, dis-tort, in-volve, toler-able, etc.
Слайд 8Semi-bound (semi-free) morphemes
Can function in a morphemic sequence both as an affix
and as a free morpheme:
E.g., the morphemes «well» and «half» can occur as free morphemes (cf. sleep well, half an hour) or as bound morphemes (cf. well-known, half-done)
Слайд 9According to their role in constructing words
Morphemes
Roots
Affixes
Слайд 10According to their position in a word
Affixes
Prefixes
Suffixes
Infixes
(unproductive
in English)
Слайд 11According to their function and meaning
Affixes
Derivational
Functional
(Endings,
inflexions)
Слайд 12A stem
When a derivational or functional affix is stripped from the word,
what remains is a stem (a stem base)
If a stem consists of a single morpheme, it is simple (heart, fact, month, red, etc.)
If a stem consists of a root and an affix, it is derived (hearty, factual, monthly, reddish, etc.)
If a stem consists of two root morphemes (and an affix / affixes), it is compound (teaspoon, mother-in-law, dog-owner, looking-glass, etc.)
Слайд 13A root
Is the main morphemic vehicle of a given idea in a
given language at a given stage of its development
Is the ultimate constituent element which remains after the removal of all functional and derivational affixes and does not admit any further analysis
Is the common element of words within a word-cluster (cf. heart, hearten, dishearten, heartily, heartless, hearty, heartiness, sweetheart, heart-broken, etc.)
Слайд 14A root
The etymological treatment of root morphemes encourages a search for cognates
(elements descended from a common ancestor):
Heart (English) – cor (Latin) – kardia (Greek) – corazon (Spanish) – Herz (German) – сердце (Russian), etc.
Слайд 15A suffix
Is a derivational morpheme following the stem and forming a new
derivative in a different part of speech or a different word class: luck – luck-y – luck-i-ly
Слайд 16A prefix
Is a derivational morpheme standing before the root and modifying the
meaning of the original word: happy – unhappy, president – ex-president, argument – counter-argument, etc.
Слайд 17A prefix
Prefixes do not generally change the part-of-speech meaning of the resultant
word
An exception to the rule is the formation of some verbs and statives: friend, n – befriend, v; earth, n – unearth (выкапывать, вырывать из земли, доставать из-под земли), v; sleep, n – asleep (stative), etc.
Слайд 18An infix
Is an affix placed within the word: -n- in «stand» (this
type is not productive).
Слайд 19Combining forms
Affixes should not be confused with combining forms
A combining form
is a bound form that is distinguished from an affix historically by the fact that it is always borrowed from another language in which it existed as a free or combining form.
Слайд 20Combining forms
Most combining forms were borrowed from Latin and Greek (however, not
exclusively) and have thus become international:
Cyclo- (from Greek «kuklos» - circle): cyclometer, cyclopedia, cyclic, bicycle, etc.
Mal- (from French «mal» - bad): malfunction, malnutrition, etc.
Compound and derivative words which these combining forms are part of never existed in their original language but were coined only in modern times.
Слайд 21
Morphemic and Structural Analysis of English Words
Слайд 22Morphemic analysis
Implies stating the number and type of morphemes that make up
the word:
Girl (one root morpheme) – a root word
Girlish (one root morpheme plus one affix) – a derived word
Girl-friend (two stems) – a compound word
Last-minuter (two stems and a common affix) – a compound derivative
Слайд 23Structural word-formation analysis
Studies the structural correlation with other words as well as
the structural patterns or rules on which words are built
Слайд 24Structural word-formation analysis
A correlation is a set of binary oppositions, in which
each second element is derived from the first by a general rule valid for all members of the relation:
Child – childish
Woman – womanish
Monkey – monkeyish
Spinster – spinsterish, etc.
Слайд 25Structural word-formation analysis
This correlation demonstrates that
in English there is a type
of derived adjectives consisting of a noun stem and a suffix –ish;
the stems are mostly those of animate nouns;
any one word built according to this pattern contains a semantic component common to the whole group, namely «typical of, or having the bad qualities of».
Слайд 26
Morphological Analysis of English Words
Слайд 27A synchronic morphological analysis (introduced by
L. Bloomfield)
Is accomplished by the procedure
known as the analysis into immediate constituents
The main opposition here is the opposition of stem and affix which reveals the motivation of the word
Слайд 28A synchronic morphological analysis
Ungentlemanly
Un-
gentlemanly
gentleman
ly
gentle
man
gent
le
Слайд 29A synchronic morphological analysis
Un- is split after the pattern: un- + adjective
stem (uncertain, unconscious, uneasy, unearthly, untimely, unwomanly, etc.);
-Ly is split following the pattern: noun stem + -ly (womanly, masterly, scholarly, etc.);
Gentleman is split into gentle- + -man after a similar pattern observed in «nobleman» (adjective stem + the semi-affix -man)
Gentle is split into gent- + -le following the pattern: noun stem + -le (brittle, fertile, juvenile, noble, subtle, little, etc.)
Слайд 30A synchronic morphological analysis
The constituents that allow further splitting into morphemes are
called immediate (gentlemanly, gentleman, gentle),
Those that don’t allow this are termed ultimate (un-, -ly, gent-, le-, -man).
Слайд 31A synchronic morphological analysis
The procedure of the analysis into immediate constituents is
reduced to the recognition and classification of the same and different morphemes as well as same and different patterns: thus it permits the tracing and understanding of the vocabulary system.