Literature review_(changed)

Outline of the project
Literature review:
Aubert, H., Ip, R., Warwick, K.
Facts and Opinions about chipping people
References

Aubert, H., (2011).
RFID technology for human implant devices.

Ip, R. (2008).
Amal Gr Amal Graafstra- The Do-It-Y a- The Do-It-Yourself ourselfer RFID Implantee: The cultur er RFID Implantee: The culture, values and ethics of hobbyist implantees: a case study

Warwick, K. (2016)
Transhumanism: Some Practical Possibilities

References
Aubert, H. (2011). RFID Technology For Human Implant Devices. Comptes Rendus Physiqe, Volume 12,
Issue 7, Pp 675-683.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2011.06.004
Ip, R. (2008). Amal Graafstra- The Do-It-Yourselfer RFID Implantees: The culture, values and ethics of
hobbyist implantees. pp. 1-15.
https://ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers/582/
Warwick, K. (2016) Transhumanism: Some Practical Possibilities. FifF Kommunikation, volume 2016,
Pp 24-27 https://www.fiff.de/publikationen/fiff-kommunikation/fk-2016/fk-2016-2/fk-2016-2-content/fk-2-16-p24.pdf

Facts & Opinions about chipping people
Nurkanov Zhalgas
Software engineering, Astana IT University​
SE-40: Foreign Language ​​
Aelita Anatolyevna Ichshanova
20 October 2022

Facts about chipping people
Such a device transmits by radio a sequence of pulses that represent a unique number. The number can be preprogrammed to function rather like a PIN number on a credit card. If someone has an implant of this type inserted and activated, the code can be checked by computer and the identity of the carrier determined.
RFID technology for human implants is generally based on battery-less (passive) devices and allows achieving very short read range, typically 10 cm or much less
In 1998, academic and cybernetics researcher Professor Kevin Warwick of the University of Reading conducted the first official RFID implant trial which he called Cyborg 1.0.

Opinions about chipping people
The remote control of human biological functions by using RFID technology seems to be more realistic.
The use of implant technology to monitor people opens up a considerable range of issues. It is not realistic to talk of tracking individuals by means of implants using the Global Positioning System, a wide area network or even a mobile telephone network. From an ethical point of view it raises considerable questions when it is children, the elderly (e.g. those with dementia) or prisoners who are subjected to tracking, even though this might be deemed to be beneficial for some people
Graafstra described the implant under his skin as an “odd feeling” and how it has made him realize: “how utilitarian our bodies actually are and how separate everything is — how separate the skin layer really is from the muscle layer under it. It really is just a rubbery protective coating.