Виды медицинских публикаций 25.07

Зачем публиковаться?
Какие бывают статьи?
Как написать статью?

↑Научную грамотность, развивает логическое и критическое мышление
2.Участие в научных дискуссиях/ конференциях
3.Стажировка /работа
4.Материальное поощрение
5.Преимущество при поступлении в ординатуру и аспирантуру.
6.Вклад в развитие науки.
7.Приоритет
Зачем?

План
1. Введение: виды научных публикаций
2. Тезис
3. Оригинальная статья
4.Описание клинического случая
5. Обзор: повествовательный vs систематический
6. Заключение

1. Научно-теоретическая
(Обзор литературы, систематический обзор и т.д.)
2. Научно-практическая
(Научный эксперимент и реальный опыт)
3. Научно-методическая
(Описание процессов и методов)
4. Смешение стилей
1.Виды

Тезис в науке - кратко сформулированные основные положения оригинальной статьи (оригинального научного исследования)
Обязательные разделы оригинальной статьи:
-Абстракт (Тезисы) (-/-)
Введение
Материалы и методы
Результаты
Обсуждение
Выводы
Список литературы
2.С чего все начинается ?

Введение/цель
Материалы и методы
Результаты
Выводы
Абстракт- авторское резюме!
Lamacchia GB, Korkes F, Baccaglini W, de Mello LGM, Szwarc M, Tobias-Machado M. A large series of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the very elderly. Ther Adv Urol. 2019 Aug 20;11:1756287219870412. doi: 10.1177/1756287219870412. Erratum in: Ther Adv Urol. 2020 Feb 6;12:1756287220906729. PMID: 31467593; PMCID: PMC6704411.

Введение/цель
Материалы и методы
Результаты
Выводы
Абстракт- авторское резюме!
Lamacchia GB, Korkes F, Baccaglini W, de Mello LGM, Szwarc M, Tobias-Machado M. A large series of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the very elderly. Ther Adv Urol. 2019 Aug 20;11:1756287219870412. doi: 10.1177/1756287219870412. Erratum in: Ther Adv Urol. 2020 Feb 6;12:1756287220906729. PMID: 31467593; PMCID: PMC6704411.

Введение/цель
Материалы и методы
Результаты
Выводы
Абстракт- авторское резюме!
Lamacchia GB, Korkes F, Baccaglini W, de Mello LGM, Szwarc M, Tobias-Machado M. A large series of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in the very elderly. Ther Adv Urol. 2019 Aug 20;11:1756287219870412. doi: 10.1177/1756287219870412. Erratum in: Ther Adv Urol. 2020 Feb 6;12:1756287220906729. PMID: 31467593; PMCID: PMC6704411.

3.Оригинальная статья. Введение
Introduction
The introduction of the da Vinci Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) in 2000 has led to a transformational change in the surgical management of prostate cancer [1]. While minimally invasive approaches with a traditional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) technique had been described prior to the development of a robotic technique [2,3], the fearsome learning curve associated with LRP [4] limited its widespread utilisation. Conversely, between 2003 and 2013, the utilisation of robot-assisted LRP (RALP) increased from 1.8% to 85% of RPs in the USA [5]. While prior robotic models used multiple arms, which mirrored the LRP approach, in 2018 a novel surgical robotic platform, the da Vinci SP Surgical System was approved by the USA Food and Drug Administration for use in urological operations. This system uses an articulating camera and instruments that are docked from a single laparoscopic trocar, as shown in Fig. 1. Clinically this system has been described in initial case reports for partial nephrectomy [6], simple cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion, [6] ureteric re-implantation [6] and singleport RALP (SP-RALP) [6,7]. Potential advantages of this approach may include improved visualisation, improved cosmesis, and reduced postoperative pain.1,2 Here, we present the first prospective descriptive study that demonstrates the technical feasibility of the SP system; we sought to describe our initial experience, surgical technique, and early outcomes for SP-RALP within a consecutive cohort of 10 patients. 3,4
Dobbs, R. W., Halgrimson, W. R., Madueke, I., Vigneswaran, H. T., Wilson, J. O., & Crivellaro, S. (2019). “Single Port Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Initial Experience and Technique With the da Vinci SP Platform.” BJU International. doi:10.1111/bju.14864
Что известно ? и Что не известно и почему?

Материалы и методы
He, H.-G., Han, C., & Zhang, W. (2015). A Mouse Model of Hypospadias Induced by Estradiol Benzoate. Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, 73(3), 589–592. doi:10.1007/s12013-015-0616-6

Материалы и методы. Дизайн

Результаты
Results A total of 62 patients were identified for inclusion in the study with median (IQR) follow up of 14 (4–33) months after surgery. Of these, 40 patients (64.5%) were non-obese and 22 (35.5%) were obese (Table 1). The majority of patients had postprostatectomy incontinence (83.9%). Of the 15 patients with diabetes, 5 patients had insulindependent diabetes, 4 of which were in the obese cohort. Five patients had a history of pelvic radiation for prostate cancer. A total of 19 patients (30.6%) reported using more than two pads daily prior to urethral sling placement. Five patients in the non-obese cohort underwent concurrent surgeries, i.e. circumcision, bladder neck dilation, hydrocelectomy, Deflux injection, and Monti channel revision. When excluding these patients who underwent concurrent surgery, the mean operative times for the non-obese versus obese cohorts were 61.8min versus 73.7min (p=0.020) (Table 1). Two patients remained in the hospital overnight due to comorbidities. One patient was hospitalized for two nights due to Monti channel revision. On multiple logistic regression, adjusting for BMI at the time of surgery, using more than two pads preoperatively was associated with a 4.0 increased odds of requiring pads at follow up (OR 1.2–13.5, p=0.027). There were no Clavien 3–5 grade complications noted. Minor complications were found among two patients who experienced transient urinary retention and one patient who developed a perineal hematoma that resolved without intervention. At follow up, 47.5% of the non-obese cohort and 63.6% of the obese cohort reported using one or more pads daily (p=0.290). Four of the five patients with a history of radiation were among the patients wearing pads following male urethral sling placement.
Monn, M. F., Jarvis, H. V., Gardner, T. A., & Mellon, M. J. (2020). Impact of obesity on male urethral sling outcomes. Therapeutic Advances in Urology, 12, 175628722092799. doi:10.1177/1756287220927997

Обсуждение
Модификации
Плюсы/недостатки метода
Сторонние исследования
Плюсы/ недостатки дизайна
Этические аспекты
Прогнозируемые и фактические исходы

Выводы
Дополнительные разделы:
Benelli, A., Mariani, S., Varca, V., Gregori, A., Barrese, F., & Cappa, M. (2018). Once-daily 5 mg tadalafil oral treatment for patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Therapeutic Advances in Urology, 10(12), 377–381. doi:10.1177/1756287218808677

Список литературы:
Мартов А. Г., Ергаков Д. В., Гусейнов М. А., Андронов А. С., Дутов С. В., Винниченко В. А., Коваленко А. А. Первоначальный опыт клинического применения тулиевой контактной литотрипсии в трансуретральном лечении мочекаменной болезни. Урология 2018;(1):112-120. [Martov A.G., Ergakov D.V., Guseinov M.A., Andronov A.S., Dutov S.V., Vinnichenko V.A., Kovalenko A. A. Initial experience in clinical application of thulium laser contact lithotripsy for transurethral treatment of urolithiasis. Urologiia = Urology 2018;(1):112-20. (In Russian)]. https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/urology.2018.1.112-120.
Khalil M. Management of impacted proximal ureteral stone: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy with holmium: YAG laser lithotripsy. Urol Ann 2013;5(2):88–92 https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.110004.
Molina WR, Marchini GS, Pompeo A, Sehrt D, Kim FJ, Monga M. Determinants of holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser time and energy during ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. Urology 2014;83(4):738–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.11.017.

4.Описание клинического случая
Абстракт клинического случая оформляется в виде одного абзаца и содержит информацию о конкретном случае
Ibrahimi, A., Ziani, I., Bellouki, O., El Sayegh, H., Benslimane, L., & Nouini, Y. (2020). Epididymo-testicular ischemia without torsion. Urology Case Reports, 33, 101324. doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101324
-Абстракт;
-Введение;
-Описание клинического случая;
-Обсуждение;
-Выводы;
-Список литературы

Клинический случай. Введение
Ibrahimi, A., Ziani, I., Bellouki, O., El Sayegh, H., Benslimane, L., & Nouini, Y. (2020). Epididymo-testicular ischemia without torsion. Urology Case Reports, 33, 101324. doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101324

Клинический случай. Описание
Case presentation A 22-year-old male with a past medical history of anxiety, depression, and ADHD presented to his local urologist with an uncomfortable right buttock mass which had been slowly growing over the past year. The patient denied any voiding or ejaculatory complaints. Physical exam was notable for soft, palpable, non-tender mass at the right buttock tracking towards the patient’s perineum. Urinalysis was unremarkable and the patient’s renal function was at baseline with a creatinine of 1.0. CT urogram demonstrated a 7.9 * 5.3 cm smoothly bordered cystic lesion in the medial aspect of the right thigh extending superiorly to the posterior aspect of the perineum abutting the urethra, without other abnormalities (Fig. 1). Flexible cystourethroscopy was performed which demonstrated a normal urethra, prostate, and bladder. A surgical excision via a perineal approach revealed a well-circumscribed mahogany mass extending toward the right gluteal region. The mass approached but was not associated with either the urethra or the rectum. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged home from the post anesthesia care unit. The final specimen was a 41g, 6.4 x 5.8 * 1.8 cm malleable soft mass filled with tan-brown caseous material. Final pathology demonstrated a benign dermoid cyst with associated granulomatous inflammation (Figs. 2 and 3). The patient was seen for follow-up three months after surgery and was doing well post-operatively. His wound appeared healthy and his gluteal discomfort had resolved. He expressed satisfaction with the outcome of his procedure.
Sloan M, Fantus RJ, Paner GP, Faris S. Perineal dermoid cyst in a young male. Urol Case Rep. 2020 Jul 22;33:101358. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101358. PMID: 33102057; PMCID: PMC7573956.

Клинический случай. Описание
Kadouri Y, Zaoui Y, Sayegh HE, Benslimane L, Nouini Y. Scrotal gunshot injury: A case report. Urol Case Rep. 2020 Sep 30;34:101437. doi: 10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101437. PMID: 33072518; PMCID: PMC7548945.

Клинический случай. Обсуждение
Dinerman, B. F., & Eid, J. F. (2020). Inflatable penile prosthesis malfunction after prostatic urethral lift. Urology Case Reports, 33, 101384. doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101384

Клинический случай. Выводы
Roberson, D., Chelluri, R., Wein, A. J., & Mucksavage, P. (2020). Chylous ascites following a right robotic assissted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Urology Case Reports, 32, 101207. doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2020.101207

Обзорная статья – это статья посвященная рассмотрению ранее опубликованных научных статей, связанных общей темой
5. Клинический обзор

5. Клинический обзор

5. Клинический обзор
Систематический обзор
Критический анализ
Оценка
Однородных оригинальных публикаций (исследований)

5. Клинический обзор

5. Клинический обзор

5. Клинический обзор
Легенда:
А-Популяция Б-Колонки В- Форест диаграмма Г-исследования включенные в мета-анализ. Д-нулевой эффект Е – Ромб ( оценка эффекта по общей выборке) Ж- статистическая достоверность З-Индекс гетерогенности

5. Клинический обзор

ENDOUROCENTER
Наука есть ясное познание истины, просвещение разума, непорочное увеселение жизни, похвала юности, старости подпора, строительница градов, полков, крепость успеха в несчастии, в счастии — украшение, везде верный и безотлучный спутник. ©М. Ломоносов