Содержание
- 2. Lexical Semantics Lexical semantics is the study of word meaning. Aims: To represent the meaning of
- 3. Lexical Semantics Word meaning is slippery: different speakers know the meaning of a word, but come
- 4. Lexical Semantics: Ambiguity Are these 5 senses of the word run or the same sense influenced
- 5. Lexical Semantics: Ambiguity Lexical ambiguity: resulting from the ambiguity of a word: Rose rose to put
- 6. Lexical Relations There are different types of lexical relation. A lexeme or semantic word may be
- 7. Lexical Relations Lexical relations are on one of the 3 following axes: Paradigmatic relations involve words
- 8. Lexical Relations Derivational relations structure the vocabulary into word families (=words derived from a single root)
- 10. Скачать презентацию
Слайд 2Lexical Semantics
Lexical semantics is the study of word meaning.
Aims:
To represent
Lexical Semantics
Lexical semantics is the study of word meaning.
Aims:
To represent
the meaning of each word in the language.
To show how the meanings of words in a language are interrelated.
Lexical relations are central to how speakers and hearers construct meaning.
There are many types of relationship that can hold between words.
To show how the meanings of words in a language are interrelated.
Lexical relations are central to how speakers and hearers construct meaning.
There are many types of relationship that can hold between words.
Слайд 3Lexical Semantics
Word meaning is slippery: different speakers know the meaning of
Lexical Semantics
Word meaning is slippery: different speakers know the meaning of
a word, but come up with different definitions.
Some of this difficulty arises from the influence of context on word meaning, which can pull word meaning in 2 opposite directions:
Collocations (=words that occur together repeatedly)
can undergo fossilization becoming
idioms (=words w/o independent meanings)
Creativity & semantic shift: f. ins. run:
a. I go for a run every morning. d. He hit a home run.
b. We took the new car for a run. e. The bears come for
c. There’s been a run on the dollar. salmon run.
Some of this difficulty arises from the influence of context on word meaning, which can pull word meaning in 2 opposite directions:
Collocations (=words that occur together repeatedly)
can undergo fossilization becoming
idioms (=words w/o independent meanings)
Creativity & semantic shift: f. ins. run:
a. I go for a run every morning. d. He hit a home run.
b. We took the new car for a run. e. The bears come for
c. There’s been a run on the dollar. salmon run.
Слайд 4Lexical Semantics: Ambiguity
Are these 5 senses of the word run or
Lexical Semantics: Ambiguity
Are these 5 senses of the word run or
the same sense influenced by different contexts?
Different senses, it is 5 ways ambiguous.
In examples of ambiguity, the context causes 1 of the senses to be selected by the participants.
Difference between vagueness & ambiguity:
A word is vague if some aspects of its meaning are unspecified, allowing some specifications:
They hired a publicist vague for gender
Senses of an ambiguous word cannot be chosen: Same sentence with 2 meanings or a sense in a network of semantic relations with other words.
Different senses, it is 5 ways ambiguous.
In examples of ambiguity, the context causes 1 of the senses to be selected by the participants.
Difference between vagueness & ambiguity:
A word is vague if some aspects of its meaning are unspecified, allowing some specifications:
They hired a publicist vague for gender
Senses of an ambiguous word cannot be chosen: Same sentence with 2 meanings or a sense in a network of semantic relations with other words.
Слайд 5Lexical Semantics: Ambiguity
Lexical ambiguity: resulting from the ambiguity of a word:
Lexical Semantics: Ambiguity
Lexical ambiguity: resulting from the ambiguity of a word:
Rose rose to put roses on her rows of roses.
Structural ambiguity: an ambiguous sentence because its words relate to each other in different ways, even though none of the individual words are ambiguous:
The chicken is ready to eat.
Structural ambiguity is a question of ‘what goes with what’ in a sentence, f. ins. old men and women
[old men] and women old only modifies men
old [men and women] old modifies men & women
Structural ambiguity: an ambiguous sentence because its words relate to each other in different ways, even though none of the individual words are ambiguous:
The chicken is ready to eat.
Structural ambiguity is a question of ‘what goes with what’ in a sentence, f. ins. old men and women
[old men] and women old only modifies men
old [men and women] old modifies men & women
Слайд 6Lexical Relations
There are different types of lexical relation. A lexeme or semantic
Lexical Relations
There are different types of lexical relation. A lexeme or semantic
word may be in a number of these relations called networks.
A group of lexemes belonging to a particular area of knowledge (i.e. cooking or sailing) is the lexical field.
Lexical relations are more common between lexemes in the same field:
peak= part of the mountain near synonym of summit
peak= part of the hat near synonym of visor
A group of lexemes belonging to a particular area of knowledge (i.e. cooking or sailing) is the lexical field.
Lexical relations are more common between lexemes in the same field:
peak= part of the mountain near synonym of summit
peak= part of the hat near synonym of visor
Слайд 7Lexical Relations
Lexical relations are on one of the 3 following axes:
Paradigmatic relations
Lexical Relations
Lexical relations are on one of the 3 following axes:
Paradigmatic relations
involve words belonging to the same syntactic category:
We bought some knives/forks/spoons/cutlery, etc
Syntagmatic relations hold between items occuring in the same sentence. The choice of possibilities is constrained by other elements in the sentence, resulting in semantic incoherence if chosen from outside a range.
I’d like a glass of dry sherry.
*I’d like a glass of striped sherry.
We bought some knives/forks/spoons/cutlery, etc
Syntagmatic relations hold between items occuring in the same sentence. The choice of possibilities is constrained by other elements in the sentence, resulting in semantic incoherence if chosen from outside a range.
I’d like a glass of dry sherry.
*I’d like a glass of striped sherry.
Слайд 8Lexical Relations
Derivational relations structure the vocabulary into word families (=words derived from
Lexical Relations
Derivational relations structure the vocabulary into word families (=words derived from
a single root) & contribute to cohesion:
cook (verb) cooking (noun)
cook (noun) cookery (noun)
cooker (noun)
The semantic relation is partly systematic, partly idiosyncratic.
Two classes of paradigmatic relations
inclusion & identity opposition & exclusion
cook (verb) cooking (noun)
cook (noun) cookery (noun)
cooker (noun)
The semantic relation is partly systematic, partly idiosyncratic.
Two classes of paradigmatic relations
inclusion & identity opposition & exclusion
- Предыдущая
ОТ РЕСУРСОВ К КАПИТАЛУ Следующая -
ТИПЫ РЫНОЧНЫХ СТРУКТУР