Tension in sternocleidomastoid muscle depending on the position of the monitor at different angles

Слайд 2


Tension in sternocleidomastoid muscle depending on the position of the monitor at different angles

Authors: Nadīna Rīmere1, Simona Rubine1,

Tension in sternocleidomastoid muscle depending on the position of the monitor at
Zane Zundāne1, Alise Guļajeva1  Scientific research supervisor: Jeļena Reste MD, PhD2 
1 Rīga Stradiņš University, Latvia 
2 Rīga Stradiņš University, Institute for Occupational Safety and Environmental Health (IOSEH), Latvia
22.03.2021.

Слайд 3

Objectives

The aim of the study is to evaluate how the posture of the

Objectives The aim of the study is to evaluate how the posture
head affects sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCMM) tension and clarify the optimal angle for the placement of the computer monitor. 
Pathogenetically, too much tension in sternocleidomastoid muscle can cause the development of head and neck pain, dizziness, and fatigue. The wrong positioning of the screen might be related to these complaints in employees. 

Слайд 4

Materials and methods

A quantitative, cross-sectional study was performed in healthy participants (the

Materials and methods A quantitative, cross-sectional study was performed in healthy participants
number of respondents was 41, male-19, female–22; mean age - 25 years).
Measurements of sternocleidomastoid muscle tension, decrement, stiffness, and relaxation were obtained by MyotonPro 5.0.0 in the sitting position. The change of head position occurred in the sagittal plane (1., 2., 3., 4., 5.).
Data were analysed by IBM SPSS Statistics version 23 using Spearman’s ρ.


Figure 1. Obtaining the measurements with MyotonPro.
1. - The neutral position, 2. - +30o up, 3. +60o up, 4. - -30o down, 5. - -60o down.
OC – outer corner of the eye; C7 – C7 spinous process; ASIS – anterior iliac spine superior

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Слайд 5

Results

The highest frequency value was at an angle of +60° (17.5 Hz (CI 17.0-18.1)), the lowest  at

Results The highest frequency value was at an angle of +60° (17.5
-30° (12.3 Hz (CI 12.1-12.5)).
The highest decrement value - at -60° (1.5 (CI 1.5-1.6)), the lowest - at +60° (1.1 (CI 1.08-1.14)).
There was no correlation between tension and dominant arm. There was a positive correlation between tension and angle (p<0.001, rs=0.76), between angle and stiffness (p<0.001, rs=0.646).
There was a negative correlation between angle and decrement (p<0.001, rs=0.68), between angle and relaxation time (p<0.001, rs=0.80), and between BMI and tension (p<0.02, rs=0.12). 

Table. Sternocleidomastoid muscle biomechanical parameters contingent upon head angle

Слайд 6

Figure 3. Sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) oscillation frequency at different head angles.

Results

Figure 3. Sternocleidomastoid muscle (SCM) oscillation frequency at different head angles. Results

Слайд 7

Conclusions

The maximal SCMM tension was at +60°, whereas the minimal - at

Conclusions The maximal SCMM tension was at +60°, whereas the minimal -
- 30°, which corresponds with information about normal SCMM physiology and biomechanics.
To determine the optimal height of the monitor position, a study with extensor muscle tension measurements should be continued.